Skip to content

OpenAI and Anthropic Slash Model API Prices in Same-Day Releases

Short answer

OpenAI released GPT-6 Sol and Luna at roughly half the price of their GPT-5.6 predecessors, while Anthropic cut Claude Opus 5.5 pricing 20% on input/output and 60% on cached tokens. For any company running AI agents or chatbots on these APIs, inference costs just dropped substantially without any migration effort beyond a model-name swap.

What this means for operators

If your support bot, sales assistant or internal automation runs on GPT or Claude APIs, this is a direct cost lever: GPT-6 Luna at $0.10/M input tokens is roughly one-twentieth the price of Claude Opus 5.5, and cached-token discounts on Opus 5.5 matter a lot if your agents run long multi-turn conversations where most tokens are repeated context. Before renewing any AI vendor contract or locking in a model choice for a new automation build, re-run the cost math — a workflow that looked expensive at GPT-5.6 or Opus 5.0 pricing may now be cheap enough to expand to more use cases, and a support queue currently routed to a premium model may run just as well on a cheaper one.

OpenAI and Anthropic released new models within an hour of each other on 22 September 2026, triggering what Simon Willison calls a price war among frontier AI vendors.

OpenAI's GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna arrived priced at roughly half their GPT-5.6 equivalents. GPT-6 Luna now costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens — among the cheapest models OpenAI has shipped, beaten only by smaller Nano-tier models. GPT-6 Sol dropped to $2/$10 per million tokens, matching what GPT-5.6 Terra used to cost, effectively removing any reason to keep using Terra. Willison also notes GPT-5.6 pricing was scheduled to rise 25% in November, meaning GPT-6's discount looks even larger against that baseline.

Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 got a 20% price cut versus Opus 5.0 through 4.8, moving from $5/$25 to $4/$20 per million input/output tokens. Cache-read pricing fell 60%, which matters directly for agentic workloads where, per Willison, over 90% of input tokens in longer conversations are served from cache. Anthropic also said cheaper Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5 models are coming, and specifically flagged Haiku's need to compete with GPT-6 Luna's pricing.

Grok 4.7, released the prior day, now sits between the two: it undercut GPT-5.6 Sol substantially at launch but is now roughly matched by GPT-6 Sol on input pricing.

Willison reports mixed results testing the models with his standard pelican-drawing benchmark: Claude Opus 5.5 at its "max" reasoning setting failed twice, hitting the 128,000-token output limit while still reasoning about a simple SVG request, costing $2.56 and about 20 minutes per failed attempt. He has since switched his own default coding tools to GPT-6 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5, and upgraded a public Datasette demo to GPT-6 Luna.

Source: Simon Willison

The tools in this story

  • OpenAI - price, who uses it, alternatives
  • Claude - price, who uses it, alternatives
  • Grok - price, who uses it, alternatives
Next step

Visibility Analyzer

An AI news item will not tell you how assistants see your own site. The Visibility Analyzer checks that on your live site: which answers cite you, which pages an engine cannot retrieve, and what to fix first. Free to run.

Run a free visibility audit

Free to run. No card.

Fee
Free
Length
One run, minutes

Free tier: two analyses a day, no card required.